top of page
Search
  • Writer's pictureNewsmakers with JR

Pot Taxes Nosedive Again Amid Weed Glut -- Supes Finally Act on Penalties for Scofflaw Growers


By Melinda Burns


Against a backdrop of sinking cannabis tax revenues, the county Board of Supervisors took steps this month to get tough with growers who fail to report their revenues from cultivation or to pay their quarterly taxes on time.



At a June 6 hearing, the board unanimously proposed that the county should not renew the business licenses of growers who miss even one quarterly deadline for tax reporting. The deadlines include a 30-day grace period. Since business licenses are valid for one year only, late filers would eventually be forced to shut down.


To date, the county has never failed to renew a single cannabis business license.


The supervisors are set to vote on a first reading, on June 27 in Santa Maria, to amend the county’s 2018 cannabis ordinance to include the new sanctions.


At the request of Supervisor Joan Hartmann, whose district includes the Sta. Rita Hills west of Buellton, where outdoor cannabis has moved into wine country, and of Supervisor Laura Capps, who represents the Goleta Valley and is the newest member of the board. Deputy County Executive Officer Brittany Odermann brought the suggested cannabis tax reporting penalties to the board for discussion. Both supervisors met with county staff to design the proposal.


“I’ve been working on this since I started," Capps said last week, "and I was really getting so frustrated that it’s unpredictable when people pay, and how much effort has to go into getting them to abide by the ordinance."


In the past five years, the county has approved 33 industrial-scale cannabis greenhouse operations just beyond the city limits of Carpinteria. .In the 2019 board elections, Capps ran and lost against Supervisor Das Williams, the chief architect of the cannabis ordinance and a resident of the small beachside community. She won election in a different district last year.


“I think the changes are long overdue, but here we are,” Capps said.


By some estimates, the prices for legal cannabis in California dropped 50 percent between 2017 and last summer. Amid an oversupply of wholesale product, customers are flocking to the black market, where prices for cannabis are 30 to 60 percent cheaper. In a sign of the failing economics of pot, four North County growers withdrew their county business licenses and abandoned their operations this spring.


Another quarter of failure for Das' pot policy. The county projected $16 million in cannabis tax revenues for the 2022-23 fiscal year but collected only $4 million during the first three quarters, Odermann told the board.


By the end of this month, the total for the fiscal year is projected to be just under $6 million, just enough to cover the $5 million cost to the county this fiscal year for cannabis enforcement, tax collection and legal counsel.


The county’s cannabis ordinance sets a four percent tax on gross receipts from cultivation; but every quarter, some growers fail to report or pay on time. County auditors must track them down, which presents a challenge for budget analysts to forecast revenue.


Growers who are delinquent and make a late payment are presently required to pay 10 percent of the tax in addition to the tax. Some simply opt to pay the fees, Odermann said.


The current ordinance does not penalize growers with zero revenues who fail to file quarterly reports on time or don’t file at all.


Of 69 growers countywide, 33 reported and paid their third quarter taxes and 24 reported zero gross receipts, or total revenues, Odermann told the board.


Twelve failed to submit a timely third quarter tax report, she said. Of those, three turned it in late; two were operating but did not file a report, and the rest had withdrawn from the business license approval process or surrendered their license.


Deep in the weed weeds. In an interview, Odermann said it was not clear how much additional tax revenue the proposed new penalties might bring in. More likely, she said, they would force growers on the margin to withdraw altogether.


To identify growers who may be underreporting their cannabis revenues — a potentially more serious problem than late filers — the county relies on data from the state Cannabis Track-and-Trace system. Cannabis and cannabis products must be tagged or labeled by each grower; the system tracks their inventory and movement through the cannabis supply chain from cultivation to sale.


This fiscal year, tax revenues from what the board calls its “cannabis program” were targeted for such services as libraries, parks, trails, open space, long-range planning, Mixteco translation, election administration, capital projects and deferred maintenance.


However, given the $10 million shortfall in the cannabis program for 2022-23, the board authorized the use of $8 million in non-cannabis tax revenues from the county’s general fund to cover those services, voting during budget hearings that began in April and concluded last Friday. Carryover cannabis tax revenues from previous years will make up the difference.


Cannabis tax revenues for the 2023-24 fiscal year are projected to be $7.5 million, the CEO’s office said. That would cover the anticipated $6 million cost of the cannabis program next year, plus $1.5 million in ongoing deferred maintenance projects, if the latest forecast holds.


An additional $3 million in carryover cannabis tax revenues are to fund a number of one-time projects in the coming fiscal year, including an employee housing study, park restroom upgrades, development of a utility-scale solar ordinance and lighting upgrades at the county Courthouse.


Melinda Burns is an investigative journalist with 40 years of experience covering immigration, water, science and the environment. As a community service, she offers her report to multiple publications in Santa Barbara County, at the same time, for free.

126 views0 comments
bottom of page